Lawsuit alleges Uber coerced drivers into supporting California Prop. 22

A team of Uber drivers has submitted a lawsuit accusing the ride-share big of coercing workers to support California Proposition 22.

California’s 2020 election ballots will contain a section for residents to vote on Prop. 22, which would allow Uber, Lyft and other journey-share businesses to classify drivers as independent contractors alternatively than staff members.

“This is an absurd lawsuit, with no advantage, submitted solely for push interest and without the need of regard for the points,” an Uber spokesperson informed FOX Business enterprise in a assertion. “It simply cannot distract from the truth of the matter: that the wide majority of drivers support Prop 22 and have for months because they know it will enhance their life and secure the way they like to get the job done.”

GM and Uber team up to lower automobile emissions and speed up the changeover to an all-electrical potential. (Photo by Dan MacMedan for Typical Motors)

The criticism accuses Uber of inundating drivers with notifications and postings in support of Prop. 22.

“Let’s be definitely crystal clear,” David Lowe, a spouse at Rudy, Exelrod, Zieff & Lowe and a person of the attorneys for the workers, stated in a Thursday statement. “Uber’s threats and frequent barrage of Prop 22 propaganda on an app the motorists will have to use to do their operate have a single reason: to coerce the drivers to assistance Uber’s political battle to strip them of workplace protections.”


Lowe has contributed $5,000 to an anti-Prop. 22 campaign identified as No on 22.

The lawsuit presents multiple examples of the prompts and messages, such as a person that “only presents the possibility for motorists to vote ‘YES ON PROP 22’ or ‘OK,'” which, according to the criticism, “pressures motorists to settle for Uber’s placement since it does not give an solution to vote no.”

ALL U.S. Personnel WILL Get A No cost A single-WAY LYFT Journey UP TO $75 TO THE POLLS TO VOTE

“Almost each time we log on, we are fed more one particular-sided information to strain us into supporting Prop 22,” plaintiff Ben Valdez stated.

The lawsuit was filed Thursday, the same day a California appeals courtroom dominated in opposition to Uber and Lyft, indicating they should comply with regulations to reclassify drivers. The organizations appealed, and have threatened to go away the state completely if they are forced to reclassify drivers.

Motor vehicle for employ with a Lyft sticker (iStock)

The ruling does not go into influence until eventually after Nov. 3 but could limit choices for Uber and Lyft must Prop. 22 fall short.

Rideshare firms argue that remaining compelled to reclassify now will leave “hundreds of thousands of Californians out of function” and shutdown rideshare providers in areas of the point out thanks to enhanced expenditures for the businesses, in accordance to a Thursday statement from Uber.

GET FOX Business enterprise ON THE GO BY CLICKING Below

California legislators argue that rideshare drivers are entitled to the rewards that come with employee classification, these types of as wellness care, compensated ill depart, family members depart, workers’ payment, vacation days and much more.

In a statewide poll asking California voters no matter whether they would vote for or in opposition to Prop. 22, 39% stated certainly, 36% mentioned no, and 25% reported they were being undecided, according to The San Fransisco Chronicle.

Click In this article TO Read through Additional ON FOX Organization

situs judi bola slot online slot thailand idn poker
Open chat
thank you for contacting us, for more information
please chat